Skip to content

Forecasts and Review of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument

About

Agreement and Interruptions

Related

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Interruptions among the justices as a predictor of voting disagreement

Search for:

Recent Posts

The Supreme Court eats its copyright vegetables
The emerging formalist-pragmatist divide on the Supreme Court (Biestek v. Berryhill forecast)
Timbs forecast: Many roads to incorporation
Visualizing the content of justices’ and advocates’ cross-references
Cross-referencing one’s friends: A universal pattern among the justices
What does it mean when justices reference each other at oral argument?
The importance of empirical analysis (with forecasts of Bucklew & Madison)
Interruptions among the justices as a predictor of voting disagreement

Archives

January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Follow Us

Twitter

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

Proudly powered by WordPress